Is
repentance turning
from sins?
How
much damage has been done to the salvation message by emphasizing “turn
from
your sins”. Does the Bible say this? How many sins must a person turn
from to
get saved? Should a person be aware of all their sins before they can
be saved?
What does
Paul mean when he says “…Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and
thou shalt be saved…” (Acts 16:31). Is he asking the jailer to turn
from his
sins first?
If repentance is “turning from sins” what would that mean?
This would
mean that a change in your behaviour is necessary, before God
can save you. In effect, you are trying to clean up your life first to
get
right with God.
Isn’t this scriptural?
No. The
Bible clearly states that God will justify the sinner and the
ungodly.
“But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth
the
ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.” (Romans 4:5)
This means
that God will justify the sinner in his sins. While the
sinner is knee-deep in his sins, God will pronounce him righteous.
You mean that no turning from sins is necessary for a man to get
saved?
Correct.
Anything else is called works. The scripture does not
say “But to him that worketh not (except you turn from your lying,
stealing,
fornication etc) but ….”
If you
have to turn from your sins first to get saved, then this is
called working for it.
Well, what would be wrong with that anyway?
Quite
simple. This is what the average Roman Catholic believes. He
believes that in order for God to pronounce you right, you should be
right.
Rome denies that God “justifies the ungodly”. This is why
countless
millions were burned at the stake by Rome.
A man is
cursed by Rome for believing that God will justify the sinner
who hasn’t got right with God first.
What is Rome’s messages of salvation?
They
believe that a man is pronounced righteous if he is righteous.
How do they do that?
Simple.
You first of all have to eat Jesus and drink his blood. When you
have done that, then you will have Jesus in your tummy and you will be
righteous inside. Now Rome says, when God sees this, he will pronounce
you
right with him.
What!!!???
No-one can
do that! For starters, you can’t eat and drink Jesus!!
Rome disagrees!
They
believe that the local priest has the power to turn the wafer and
the grape juice into the actual physical body and blood of
Jesus.
You mean it represents the body and blood of Jesus?
No. Rome believes that it
is the actual, physical, material body and blood of Jesus. They call it
the
‘unbloody sacrifice’ for sins. And if you eat and drink the actual body
and
blood of Jesus you will have enough righteousness inside to be
considered by
God to be called righteous (albeit temporarily). Because you have to
keep doing
it over and over again to stay in God’s good books.
What about Luther? Didn’t
he break away from this?
Partly. He said that you
couldn’t make the wafer into the actual body and blood of Jesus. This
is called
trans-substantiation i.e. a substance is ‘trans-ferred across
into
another substance’. No, he wouldn’t go that far. But he said
although
the wafer and the wine wasn’t made into the actual, physical body and
blood of
Jesus, it still contained his ‘essence’. This meant that the wafer and
the wine
has the presence of Jesus in it. This is called the
con-substantiation.
What’s wrong with that?
Everything. The Lord’s
supper is only ordinary bread and grape juice that is eaten and drunk
in
remembrance. It starts out bread and juice and ends up bread and juice.
They
are not changed into Jesus and secondly, Jesus doesn’t put his
‘presence’ or
‘essence’ into them either.
What are the ‘last rites’
then?
Rome falsely believes that
if a man or woman can eat Jesus before they die, they will go to
heaven.
So, your local Catholic
priest rocks up with ‘Jesus’ in his briefcase (the wafers and wine) and
stuffs
them down the neck of the dying person. If he can ram a bit of Jesus
into the
person’s tummy before he dies, then God will see Jesus in that person
and give
the dying man the big tick into heaven.
So what’s all this got to
do with what we started talking about?
Everything. The principle
is the same. If a man can turn from his sins and clean his act a lot or
even a
bit, God will be happy with him. God will then save the man. But the
person has
to do the turning from sins first.
So what are you saying?
The Roman Catholic
principle remains the same – internal righteousness comes first by
eating
goodness (Jesus) or doing good (turning from your sins). Both are the
same and
both are Roman Catholic doctrine.
So what is true repentance
then?
Repentance is turning from
unbelief.
What do you mean?
Repentance is not turning
from your sins or eating Jesus, but turning from your unbelief toward
God.
There are three scriptures:
“…and ye believed him not: but the publicans and the
harlots believed
him: and ye, when ye had seen it, repented not
afterward, that ye
might believe him.” (Matt 21:32)
“Then said Paul, John
verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the
people,
that they should believe on him which should come after him,
that is,
on Christ Jesus.” (Acts 19:4)
“In meekness instructing
those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance
to the acknowledging of the truth;” (2Tim 2:25)
“I’m not sure I’ve got it
yet. Go on.”
Repentance is a turning
away, but not from your sins. Repentance is a change in direction.
Repentance
is to change what you believe. You change your mind about what will
save you.
With your will, you believe
and rely on Christ to save you. To get saved, you repent of unbelief in
Christ
and believe that his doing and living the perfect life can be your
substitute.
You turn from your belief that eating Jesus will save you.
That’s too simple isn’t it?
No. The Bible says
that the actual blood of Jesus, shed 2000 years ago, is the
only
sacrifice that he recognizes as payment for sin. “….there remaineth
no more
sacrifice for sins …” (Heb 10:26)
Isn’t believing a work?
No. The Bible says “…to him
that worketh not, but believeth…” (Rom 4:5)
But don’t I have to turn from anger, pride, selfishness,
coveting,
lying, drunkenness, stealing first?
No, but it sounds right doesn’t it? Put it this way. When
a person is
first saved, he does not know all the sins that he has
to turn
from. God’s divine order is salvation first then change - not change
and then
salvation! You can repent of sin without repenting of unbelief. And if
this is
the case, you’ll end up in hell.
I’ve nearly got it, go on
A sinner before he gets
saved, is sorry for his sins and wants to get free of the burden of his
sin -
the guilt, the shame, pain and hurt that his sin has caused. But when a
man
gets saved, the Holy Ghost comes and lives within that man. Then the
conviction
of sin really starts.
So God’s order is to repent
of unbelief first, then repent of sin?
Correct. If a person must
turn from his sins to be saved, of what sins must he first repent of?
This
would be works. If turning from sins could get you saved, then turning
back to
sins would get you lost. The jailer thinks that he has to do something
to get
saved. Paul says “No, believe.” No action needed, just a mind change.
With the Holy Ghost within
a man, comes the ongoing conviction of sin and the things we need to
turn away
from.
The Christian life becomes
one of constant sorrow of sin and sins – until we wake up in Heaven one
day in
the likeness of Christ.
Harley Hitchcock
***************
This
website’s front page is:
www.
**************************************
**************************************
This article (Is repentance turning
from sins?) is on this website for your kindle, click on this link
and find it in the list
*****************************************************************