ADDING MORE ONE LINERS

“ADDING MORE ONE LINERS
TO REFUTE THE FOGASS”
Part 7 of 8

Dear Reader, keep in mind who the FOGASS are … the fumbling, blind sprouters of Formal Equivalence (although settled in the 1611 King James Bible), the mystical Originals that no-one has seen, the Greek for those who cannot, indeed will not, understand the English … whereby culminating in the blasphemous Additions, Subtractions and Substitutions of words and phrases eg no “begotten”, no “hell”, no “Easter (Acts 12:4)” … and the shameful list goes on and on and on …

Question: “What about great men who don’t believe the King Bible?”

Answer: “That is sad, but God will get the glory … as his words never change … and by the way, these men are subject to the perfect, infallible and inerrant words of God in the king James Bible. We are reminded of the story of men who feared God, but still served their own gods
(2 Kings 17:26-28).”

Question: “What about the italics … weren’t they added by the 1611 Translators?”

Answer: “That’s no problem. They will always be necessary when going from one language to another. All translations from all languages into any language need italics. To say otherwise simply means that people do not have a clue when sprouting such rubbish. The 1611 men were honest enough to put the italics in … but all the other versions don’t … they are deceitful.”

Question: “Don’t make me laugh … what? … if the King James was good enough for Paul, it’s good enough for me.”

Answer: “What would Paul use then? The NIV? NASB? NKJV? Now that’s a laugh and a half! Changing ‘Easter’ to ‘Passover’ (Acts 12:4)? … no ‘begotten’? … no ‘hell’? People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones … they should take the beam out of their own eye first … What say ye?”

Question: “What about the Septuagint? Isn’t it valuable?”

Answer: “No, it’s absolute rubbish. The LXX is nothing more than OOO … Origin’s Old Oracles … nothing more than the 2^nd column of Origin’s Hexapla. Do some study! Furthermore, fancy the Jews letting the Greeks near the Hebrew scriptures for translation … now that is the equivalent of letting a snake into a chook yard.

Question: “What’s the difference between the two families of scriptures … Antioch from Syria versus Alexandria from Egypt?”

Answer: “Go through all the mentions of Egypt-Alexandria in the Bible and see its negative connotations with God’s judgment. Do the same with Antioch and see God’s blessings upon it. Conclusion? Nothing good comes out of the former … especially its family of manuscripts.”

Question: “So are the Bibles that aren’t in English corrupt … German, French, Japanese and so on … that is … if the perfect one is to be found in the King James Bible?”

Answer: “The template for all Bibles is the King James Bible. The rest have to do their best with what they’ve got. But that is why the world’s official language is English for business, technology, medicine and so on. It’s up to the rest of the world to learn English … which they desperately want to do … except the Bible Critics.”

Question: “Of the 5,000 or so manuscripts, isn’t it true the best ones support the new versions like the NIV, NASB, NKJV?”

Answer: “Absolutely false! The best ones support the Bible, the King James Bible, the Authorized Bible … and these are the 4,995 that all agree with each other. But here’s the thing … the other five disagree with one another to prop up the NIV, the NASB and the NKJV. Truly we live in the last days where the minority wrongly rule the majority.”

Harley Hitchcock
March 2025

This website’s front page is:
www.AustralianBibleMinistries.com

“FOGS AND DONKEYS”