FURTHER ONE LINERS TO REFUTE THE FOGASS

“FURTHER ONE LINERS
TO REFUTE THE FOGASS”

Part 6 of 8

Dear Reader, keep in mind who the FOGASS are … those that spew Formal Equivalence (although this had been settled in 1611), the Originals, the Greek, the Addition and the Subtraction and the Substitution of words and phrases in the King James Bible.

Question: “Aren’t King James Bible believers simply name callers?”

Answer: “No. Christ himself called the Pharisees and Sadducees white washed sepulchres; Paul calls the Galatians bewitched; the Ephesians as fools (Ephesians 5:15); and Paul ‘sarcastically’ calls people wise
(2 Corinthians 11:19); the wise of this world are fools (Romans 1:22). No, it’s the unteachable that put up this feeble defence of name calling (2 Timothy 4:3). Furthermore, it’s those that accuse King James Believers of name calling are in fact the name callers themselves … you know … church splitters, arrogant, divisive and conspirators. ”

Question: “Don’t King James Bible believers split up churches?”

Answer: “No. Churches rarely split over doctrine. It is personalities that do the splitting. Some people just don’t like other people … too much power in the church; getting too much attention; how the money should be spent; what colour to paint the walls and so on. Being such impeccable, moral living and ‘sinless’ Christians, they will not be accused of any of the flesh sins in Galatians chapter five … will they? No! Let’s blame the King James Bible Believers instead.”

Question: “Can’t the Bible versions be used to get people saved?”

Answer: “Of course, but you’ll never grow with reading and believing them.”

Question: “What does the title ‘The Authorized Bible’ mean?”

Answer: “It was translated and authorized for the common man. The common man fills the armies, buys food at the grocery store and fills the gas tanks. The common man has common sense … it’s the so-called the pub test.”

Question: “I’ve heard that King James authorized his Bible to be used in churches?”

Answer: “Incorrect. He authorized it’s translation for the common man and not its usage in churches.

Question: “What about today’s translators … aren’t they better than the 1611 Translators?”

Answer: No … this is a lie. Get hold of a couple of books by Alexander McClure and Gustavus S. Paine writing about who the 1611 men were … and get up to speed. The 1611 men forgot more Greek than today’s professors will ever learn.”

Question: “Did the 1611 Translators ever claim to be inspired by God?’

Answer: “Of course not. They would not be so arrogant. They had fervent and pious hearts the whole bang lot of them! No, God was the author of the King James Bible … these men were simply the humble writing instruments to bring this about.”

Question: “Did the King James Bible just suddenly appear on the scene? What was its history?”

Answer: “This is the lie that has been perpetrated by its critics. The King James Bible was simply a gem … already in formative existence … that needed the polishing to shine more brightly of the Wyclif, Tyndal, Coverdale, Matthew, Great, Geneva and Bishop Bibles. The King James Bible was not a new Bible. it was the result of hundreds of Bibles of the godly line, in all languages of the world. More specifically, it was the 250 years before the 1611 Bible with the Wyclif, Tyndal, Coverdale, Matthew, Great, Geneva and Bishop Bibles, that brought the 1611 into full bloom … along with the 5,000 or so godly writings and manuscripts from around the world.”

Harley Hitchcock
March 2025

This website’s front page is:
www.AustralianBibleMinistries.com

“FOGS AND DONKEYS”