“QUICK ONE LINERS TO REFUTE THE FOGASS”
Part 2 of 7
Question: “Aren’t there errors in the King James Bible?”
Answer: “No. Show me one if you can, but you’ve got hundreds in your version.”
Question: “Is the King James Bible internally reliable? Surely it must
contradict itself?”
Answer: “Yes” to the first part and “No” to the second.
Question: “Believing the King James Bible makes me unpopular. What should I do?”
Answer: “Be unpopular … but not with God.”
Question: “How many mistakes and errors are in the King James Bible?”
Answer: “None.”
Question: “Wasn’t Erasmus a good Roman Catholic?”
Answer: “If he was, why did Rome put his works on the forbidden list?
Question: “What if the King James Bible disagrees with the Greek Lexicons?”
Answer: “Get rid of the Lexicons.”
Question: “Shouldn’t we just love Jesus and stop fighting over which Bible?”
Answer: John 14:23 says that if you love Jesus you will keep his words.
Question: “Shouldn’t Doctors in Theology be respected?”
Answer: “Yes, but only if they’re not FOGASS.”
Question: “We shouldn’t fight about Bibles?”
Answer: “Correct! There is only one.”
Question: “What if my Bible College doesn’t believe the King
James Bible?”
Answer: “You’re wasting your money.”
Question: “What about the difference between “agape” and
“phileo”?”
Answer: “There is none.”
Question: “Isn’t the Greek superior to the English?”
Answer: “No, just the opposite. The TR needed to be corrected in 1,000 places.”
Question: “Aren’t there nuggets to be found in the Greek?”
Answer: “Correct … nuggets of Fools Gold.”
Question: “Oh, aren’t you being a Ruckmanite?”
Answer: “No. I’m a Bible-ite.”
Harley
Hitchcock
February
2025
This
website’s front page is:
www.AustralianBibleMinistries.com
“MORE ONE LINERS TO REFUTE THE FOGASS”
“STILL
MORE ONE LINERS
TO REFUTE
THE FOGASS”
Part 4 of 7
“WERE THE 1611 KING JAMES TRANSLATORS
INCOMPETENT, DIM-WITTED DILLS?”
aka “Their supposed 1611 failure to
correctly translate Jesus as Joshua
in Hebrews 4:8”