“The
King James Bible” Which Bible Should I Study?
As a Christian, you have no
choice – it’s The King James Bible also known as The Authorized
Bible
As there is one God, one
Jesus Christ and one Holy Ghost, there is only one Bible with pure
words (Ps 12:6-7).
Q: “What if English is my
second language?” A: “No problem, just do your best with the
language Bible you have, but remember the standard for all other
languages is the Authorized Bible”
Furthermore, as a believer,
your saved soul has been separated from your physical body of sins (Col
2:11), so why not separate yourself from the many sins and corruptions
of all other ‘bible’ versions, and read the purified Bible?
|
Errors in the King James
Bible
There are none. The false suggestion that
there are errors in the Authorized Bible, is generally promoted by
those who won’t be subject to the words of God in English.
Generally, these are people who resort to the Greek or Hebrew, believe
another man’s opinion or who are bound by some denominational creed.
The King James Authorized Bible is the only pure, perfect,
infallible, inerrant, inspired and preserved
words of God
|
All other Bible Versions
They are not Bibles but are
satanic counterfeits backed by Rome. “… the words of the LORD are pure
words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven
times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from
this generation for ever. Psalm 12:6-7. (Deut 4:2 12:32; Rev
22:19; Prov 30:6). There are many thousands of errors, omissions,
additions, substitutions and corrupt doctrine
in all the other versions eg the NKJV, NIV and the
NASB.
|
The Greek Game
This is a ploy used by
gnostic Christians (people with their own self appointed deeper
spiritual knowledge) to destroy the belief of the average Christian in
the plain English of the Authorized Bible. For example, the Greek word “haplotes”
is translated five different ways in the King James Bible, and they are
‘liberal’, ‘bountifulness’, ‘liberality’, ‘simplicity’
and ‘singleness’. Now, puffed up preachers destroy the
common man’s faith in the Bible by saying “The translators made a
mistake as this word should not be ‘liberality’ but ‘simplicity.”
Another case in point are
the words “agape” and “phileo” with the former supposedly being ‘God’s
love’ and the latter being ‘brotherly love’. This is absolutely
wrong.
For example, we have Jesus
speaking “As many as I love (phileo)…” (Rev
3:19). Conversely, Jesus speaks of the Pharisees and how they “…love
(agape) the uppermost rooms.” (Lk11:43)
Using the Latin language of
Rome, Satan hid the Bible away from the common man for over one
thousand years. With the Bible having been translated into the King
James English, Satan has now succeeded into getting the Bible back into
the hands of the scholars and away from the common man once again – but
this time into the hands of the Greek and Hebrew scholars.
|
Interpretation
Ever heard someone say “Oh,
that’s just your interpretation” when it comes to understanding the
Bible. People say “Well I believe this and I think that.” It doesn’t
matter what people think or believe. It’s what the scriptures actually
say. Many are too quick to put their own interpretation on things
without finding out what is written.
|
As the scriptures say
Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private
interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of
man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. 2 Peter 1:20-21
The Bible is not hard to
understand. We look at what it says, is actually written, rather than
what we think it means. Many people come to the Bible with preconceived
ideas as to what it means. Of course, you have to have the King James
Bible first of all. All the other versions are not Bibles – NIV, NKJV,
Good News, NASV and the list goes on. There are over 300 other versions
that have been published. Of course, if you were Satan there would be
only one Bible you would want to change, and that would be the King
James.
|
The Italics
Italics are vital for a translation to give the
proper meaning.
For example: The Authorized
Bible says “God judgeth the righteous, and God is angry with the wicked every day.” (Psalm
7:11) If there were no italics the verse would read “God judgeth the
righteous, and God is angry every day.” What does that mean? Is God
angry with the righteous every day? Is God just angry every day? All
other versions, while casting stones at the King James Bible for
including italics, are deceitful, as they omit them entirely.
|
The Greek Versus the English
There is no contest, as the
English Authorized Bible is far
superior to any of the Textus Receptus compilations which all
have needed correction in about a thousand places. Furthermore, at the
last count as of 2007, thirty two Greek texts had been manufactured by
man.
Had God wanted the world to
read the Bible in Greek, he would have had Greece conquer the world.
No, this duty was given to England who produced the perfect, inerrant,
inspired and infallible King James Bible, also known as the Authorized
Bible, and sent it to the four corners of the earth.
|
Revisions
The revisions of the King
James Bible prior to 1800, were simply to correct any mechanical errors
of printing and language changes. They fall into three categories
1. Fonts. The modern “u”
was written as “v”. The modern “ss” was written like a “B”.
2. Typo’s (typographical).
These were simply mis -spelled words
3. Spelling. Words like
“ran” could be spelt “ranne” or “rann”
|
Older and better manuscripts
Are the newer versions of
the Bible based on older and more accurate manuscripts? No, this is an
absolute lie. The manuscripts that are reckoned to be older and more
accurate come from Rome. They are Vaticanus and Sinaiticus. These two
manuscripts were originally discarded by Rome and thrown away into
rubbish bins. They were simply full of errors and doctrinal lies. This
was until a fellow called Tischendorf re-discovered them and Rome used
them to overthrow the perfection of the King James Bible. The King
James translators had studied them as well, knew they were false and
had also thrown them away as useless, being full of errors.
|
Errors
There are no errors in the
King James Bible. Unlearned scholars and immature professors try and
point out some apparent contradictions. This is because they will not
believe that their arguments are untrue when pointed out to them and
disproved.
|
Old English Language
The King James language is
not ‘out of date’ or ‘old English’. The King James language is simply
Bible language. No-one expects a medical textbook or an engineering
manual to be written in everyday
language, as there are terms and definitions that have certain
meanings. The King James Bible uses language of a highly specific
nature. The King James Bible is written as a legal document and can
stand any scrutiny in any court of the land. Instead of man trying to
bring God’s language down to the common level of man, we are to reach
up and understand the language that God would have us use.
|
Infallibility,
inerrant, inspired, preserved, pure words, no private interpretation,
perfect
Even
though the King James translators were fallible and with error, the
King James Bible is not. This proves that God was the author and not
mere men. They simply said they were only instruments in God’s hands.
The translators were the writers but not the authors. As the Bible says
For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of
man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. 2 Peter 1:21
The
following is an excerpt from “The Statement of Beliefs of the King
James Bible Church, Brisbane, Australia.”
We
believe The King James Authorized Bible to be the pure, perfect,
infallible, inerrant, inspired and preserved words of God, and consists
of the sixty-six books as found preserved in the 1611 King James
Authorized Bible. Holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy
Ghost and their words were written down, and have been divinely
preserved, throughout the ages, until reaching us in its present form.
The King James Authorized Bible has preserved the very words of God in
the form he wanted in the universal language of these last days -
English.
We
believe that God’s word, The King James Bible, is the words of God, and
therefore we totally reject all other English bible versions. We
believe that any Greek Textus Receptus has been corrected in several
hundred places by the 1611 King James Authorized Bible. We believe that
the scriptures are not open to private interpretation.
Holy
Men spake: 2Pet 1:20-21; Luke 1:70
God’s
word: 2Sam 23:2; Ps 119:11, 89, Psa 138:2 ; Is 8:20; Luke 4:4; John 17:17;
1Thess 2:13; Heb 4:12
Words
of God: Deut 18:19; Prov 4:20; Matt 24:35; Luke 4:4; Jn 6:63, John 12:48
Pure
words: Prov 15:25, Pro 30:5; Ps 12:6
Private
Interpretation: 2Pet 1:20-21
Inspiration:
2Tim 3:16-17
Preservation:
Ps 12:6-7, Matt 24:35; 1 Pet 1:23-25
Other
English bible versions: 1Cor 2:13-14, 1Co 14:33; 2Cor 2:17; Rom 10:17 (not
by other versions’ words); Heb 4:12; Jn 12:48; Matt 24:35; 1Thess 2:13;
Rev 22:19;
Deut
4:2; Jer 26:2; Prov 30:6; 2Tim 4:3;
Note:
Ever heard the saying “The sun never set on the English empire.”? God
waited till one nation ruled the world, and then he used the English
language to produce his perfect Bible.
Furthermore,
to the chagrin (mortification, disappointment, humiliation,
grief, sorrow, embarrassment, discomfort, wounded pride) of all gnostic
Bible scholars, it’s wasn’t in the Greek or the Hebrew. (A chagrin is a
roughened leather tool used for rasping wood.) The English
rasps/smooths/corrects and files down the Greek and Hebrew in about
1,000 places.
|
The
Inspired Scriptures
All
scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for
doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
righteousness: 2 Timothy 3:16
Is
the King James Bible the scripture? Yes of course. Then it must be
inspired.
The
modern versions (NIV, NASB, Good News, New World translation, the
Catholic Douay etc) have errors, therefore they can’t be the
scriptures.
|
Apocrypha
These
books were never part of the Bible. They was just included between the
Old and the New Testaments as historical documents.
|
|
Words not in the Bible
The world uses words like ‘nature' instead of 'creation'. The Bible says to 'train' children not 'educate' them.
Other words not in the
Bible are gifting, humanitarian, idea, environment, concept,
humanity, evolution, education, communicate, improving, depression,
awesome, brain, conservation, communicate, attitude, concept,
contemporary, culture, dynamic, effort, energy, entertain, habitat,
excitement, impact, expression, improving, manage, spirituality,
universe, unaware, uniting, zest, focus, research, information,
positive, anxiety, utilize, feelings, emotions, stress, and the
list goes on.
If you can get people to
change their everyday language, they’ll soon see the King James Bible
as using ancient, archaic and irrelevant words.
When preaching or teaching
or evangelizing, other words may be used to explain Bible terms. The
above list is to be found in all other ‘bible’ versions but
they are not of the Bible.
WHICH
BIBLE
|