“SPEAKA’ DA’ ENGRISH?”
“SPEAKA’ DA’ ENGRISH?”
OT vs NT
salvation
Dear
Reader, the whole world is falling over
themselves to ‘learna da’ Engrish’ … and do you know why?
… God’s
put it IN their heart.
As God is
the true Light which lighteth
every man that cometh into the world (John 1:9) … he wants them to read
his true
words of the English King James Bible.
Now as
Bible words have meanings, Mr Newby …
a new Engrish Christian … as well as new to the English
language … you
know the fellow … he has a great desire to learn English … he
eventually wins
English spelling contests.
So he
comes across the word “remission” in
his King James, so he looks up the Dictionary, and finds that it means
… in the
case of cancer … that the cancer can come back again … it’s only
temporary … no
permanent cure.
So then Mr
Newby looks up the word “remission”
in a King James Bible Concordance and finds the verses that say “for
the
remission of sins that are past” (Romans 3:25) and “without
shedding of blood is no remission” (Hebrews 9:22).
Now
fascinated by all this, he then discovers that
the word “redemption” is also connected with the getting rid
of sins
with “In whom (Jesus Christ) we have redemption through his
blood,
even the forgiveness of sins:” (Colossians 1:14).
Now, not
wanting to be ashamed (2 Timothy 2:15), he
ponders … “Mmmm!” As they are two different words, will they have two
different
meanings?”
Then the
light bulb in his head flicks on …
“For it is
NOT possible that the blood of
bulls and of goats should take away sins.” (Hebrews 10:4).
So Mr
Newby puts two and two together, and
discovers that the Christian Peanut Gallery have got it all wrong
believing
that “Salvation in the OT is the same as salvation in the NT … that is
… saints
in the OT had eternal security”.
He
discovers that under the OT, saints only
ever had a temporary remission of sins with the blood of
bulls and
goats … their sins were never taken away, but only covered (Romans
4:7;
Psalm 32:1) … but with Christ, saints under Paul’s NT dispensation,
have redemption
from sins … that is … eternal security … saints washed from
their sins
… not merely covered … with Christ’s blood (Revelation 1:5).
Unlike a
Pauline Christian, the Old Testament saint
could only ever have his sins covered … never washed away
… with
animal blood.
A case in
point is this … several years ago, I had
a two hour conversation with a saved King James Bible using … not a
believer … Pastor
… who had spoken English all his life … ‘studied every word of
the Bible
twice’ he told me … an American Pastor came out and taught him … so
there
should be no excuse … who could not? would not? grasp
what the
diligent Mr Engrish Christian Newby had found.
Having
pulled out all my hair … the floor
was covered … and trying very hard not to wring some knowledge into
this
Pastor’s brain via his neck, I said “If saints in the OT had eternal
security,
why is it they kept on shedding animal blood day after day.”
His reply
… Chirp! Chirp! … silence … … …
… …
“Ah! Da’
Engrish of the Old King Jimmy Bible!”
Harley
Hitchcock
August 2024
This
website’s front page is:
www.
“ARE THE SO
CALLED ‘BEST’ MANUSCRIPTS
ANY BETTER?”
Answer: “No
… they’re worse! Yum! Yum!
