BULLSEYE!
ACCURATE BIBLE KNOWLEDGE!
“SHOULD THE APOCRYPHA BE IN THE BIBLE?”
BULLSEYE!
ACCURATE
BIBLE KNOWLEDGE!
“SHOULD
THE APOCRYPHA BE IN THE BIBLE?”
QUESTION:
“Should the apocrypha be in the Bible
WHAT IS THE APOCRYPHA?
Because of the
lies and mistakes in these various religious writings,
they were
not included in the sixty-six books of the Bible that we now have.
Some of the
titles are: The First and Second Books of Esdras; Tobit; Judith; The
Rest of the
Chapters of the Book of Esther; The Wisdom of Solomon; Ecclesiasticus
or The
Wisdom of Jesus the son of Sirach; Baruch; A Letter of Jeremiah; The
Song of
the Three; Daniel and Susanna; Daniel, Bel, and the Snake; The Prayer
of
Manasseh; The First and Second Books of the Maccabees.
From
the beginning of the 1st century till the 1611 King James
Bible was
printed, Rome had held the world in the darkest grip of ignorance, vice
and
corruption. It is no wonder they included the Apocrypha in their Bible
to back
up their evil practices.
Yes,
but it was placed between the Old Testament and the New
Testament. At
the time the 1611 Bible was translated, the Apocrypha was accepted
reading and
doctrine by the Roman Catholic church but not by any Christians.
That
was the lie that was promoted. The 1611 translators put it in the same
book, between
the Old and the New Testaments, to expose the errors and false
doctrine
it contained. You see for centuries, Rome has been repeating that the
Apocrypha
was the Bible in the Bible, to such an extent that this lie had sunk
into the
mind of the average man in the street. It was taken as truth. There is
that saying
“If you repeat a lie long enough, it soon becomes truth.”
But
now with the 1611 translation, the man in the street was now able to
compare,
in one book, side by side, the true scriptures of the Old and New
Testaments
with the false lies and doctrine of Rome. The KJ translators put it
there to
expose it for all its errors.
The
KJ translators rejected the Apocrypha as scripture for obvious reasons,
and
therefore would not integrate it into the Bible text for the following
reasons:
2.
Not one of
the
writers lay claim to inspiration.
These
books were never acknowledged as sacred scriptures by the
Jewish church,
and therefore never sanctioned by our Lord as he never quotes from them.
The immaculate conception of
Mary is this:
Mary was not born with a sin nature. Mary was conceived without the
stain of
original sin. Adam and Eve’s sin was inherited by all other human
beings, but
God spared the mother of his Son.
I MEAN WOULD THEY KNOW A BEE FROM
A BULL’S FOOT?
Harley Hitchcock
This
website’s front page is:
www.
*
***************
****************
